I’m
growing up in a generation in which homosexual relationships are slowly being
normalized in the media. The narrative of the gay community is gradually being
told for entertainment-seekers across America. At first this bugged me. After
all, I’m fairly conservative in my views and have not been able to reconcile
the gay lifestyle with an honest reading of the bible. (I suspect that last
statement rouses an emotional response in many people which further
demonstrates that we live in an increasingly polarized world in which civil
disagreements are alarmingly rare.)
It has
become much more normal (and I admit quite interesting, though still not entirely
comfortable) to see the unique
challenges and dynamics of gay relationships and orientation communicated
across the airwaves. One of the shows that I think does a good job of telling
that story is Downton Abbey. Yes, we’re THOSE
people. We love the show and are fascinated by the complex human
interactions in a world driven by status.
If
you’re not into the show, Thomas, a closeted gay servant spends most episodes
plotting, backbiting, and generally being a jerk. But recently he visited the
bedroom of another male servant whom he mistook for being gay. The other
servant, angry at Thomas’ sexual advance condemns him loudly and makes sure
that Thomas is dismissed from service.
One of
the ideas that comes out is that Thomas didn’t choose this lifestyle but that he was born this way. As Thomas says
to his supervisor, “I’m not foul, Mr. Carson. I may be different than you but
I’m not foul.” The compassionate Mrs. Hughes agrees that Thomas in spite of all
his flaws did not choose to be gay.
I
appreciate the show’s ability to show every character as good and evil despite
their views. All characters, wherever they land on the debate, are capable of
arrogance, intolerance, and profound compassion.
But I
know that many of my evangelical friends will take offense at the “subtle
message” in the show that a homosexual orientation can be innate from birth.
Trouble is, I think many of my gay friends are
“born with it.” But how can I
say that and still land with the evangelicals? How can I admit that something
is ingrained in a person’s nature but not encourage that person to act on that
aspect of their identity? Isn’t it cruel? Shouldn’t we be free to act out
according to our personal nature in ways that do no harm?
Some
Christians will say “Homosexuality is inborn… just like alcoholism or
sociopathic tendencies.” I take
issue with that because those things cause clear harm to self and others. On
the contrary I’ve seen loving, monogamous gay relationships that seem to bring
people to new places of life and creativity.
But I
DO think we live and breathe in a tainted universe. Some of the affects of what
Christians call “original sin” are the bad things we choose do. But we’re also
victims of a twisted world in which bad things happen to us… some things
nobody can control. Pain and
unright-ness enter the world from all angles: natural disasters, honest
misunderstandings, fear-driven behavior, “natural” predispositions, or just
plain rottenness…
I think
the bigger issue for Christians is… If homosexuality is always a choice, then
our approach will be to help gay people “unchoose” their orientation. (Likewise
if everything wrong in the universe is a result of someone’s choices, then
we’ll lean heavily on behavior modification to get us out of this mess.) I’m
suspicious of so-called “reparative” therapy and I would never encourage one of
my gay friends to “pray away the gay.” A fascinating long-term study on
“reparative” programs like Exodus International showed that people’s
experiences in such programs were not on-average negative or psychologically
harmful but that reported “heterosexual adjustment” or changes in orientation
were relatively minor.
I
figure that in the final analysis, we’re all born somewhere on the orientation spectrum
(yes, I think it’s a spectrum). Some people may make choices to identify more
or less strongly with that orientation. I have gay friends that refuse to call
themselves gay and prefer to use the terminology of attraction over
orientation. Other people will just “call it what it is” and move on with life.
But I’m suspicious of anybody who assumes that what is natural is always good
if it can be deemed “harmless”… one, because of the seldom-examined
philosophical and theological underpinnings of the simple word “harm”. And two
because the story of Eden teaches Christians that not all things created are
meant to be engaged and not all things natural are made for exploration.
The
watershed question for humans is, “can a good God make fruit which I must not
eat? Can self-control or self-limitation still end in my happiness and fulfillment? And I think
the answer is that it can and it will, but each person must deeply wrestle with
that question for themselves.
In my
life, I’ve felt deep anger toward God for hardwiring things into me which I
must live with and control every day. I’ve experienced the alienation of not
feeling allowed to participate in the things which feel deeply ingrained, even
natural from birth. How could a kind God allow this to happen?
But
throughout those struggles, the one thing I’ve found God to be is kind: Kinder
than tolerance or civility or acceptance. Kind enough to hold me, to love me,
and yes, kind enough to challenge me and to allow me to face painful inner
struggles that come from the deep places where my very identity lives. BECAUSE
of God’s kindness, I feel I have choice again... maybe not the ability to
choose my sexual orientation, but certainly the ability to choose my actions.
Because of the intimate whispering love of the Father, I could be absolutely
gay, absolutely celibate, and absolutely content.
I know that saying this won’t make me very many friends. I think many people find me either too
conservative or too liberal. But this is as true to my experience and
understanding as I can get right now.
Many of
my friends and family will disagree strongly, but choose to remain in
relationship with me. I’m happy with that. Because one thing our opinions or
dogmas or sexual orientations CANNOT do is make us less human or less loved.
I’m tired of the rampant self-righteousness of humanists and Christians alike
which withholds human dignity and belonging to whole groups of people based solely
on what they think. I believe what I
believe and I’ll be honest… I can be arrogant and dogmatic about it sometimes.
But your right to be treated with dignity as a human being made in God’s image
should NEVER be mitigated by my dogmas. Period.
And
that, I think, is the real heart-cry of a young generation wrestling through
life in a pluralistic society. Outside of more radical postmodern experiments it’s not a cry for co-existence. It’s a cry for
kindness. And THAT’S why Jesus is still relevant to my generation.